vue - Explaining the Expanding Earth - With Peter Woodhead - Part 1

1. I actually think are moon may have one been small proto planets that went though expansion and a higher intelligence more advanced than use has used these moons as a travelling space colony's that they can manipulate and move into locations or around planets that many support life. There is definitely a intelligence that are terraforming young planet's. Phobos is obviously used in this fashion I think these moons and command and control centers for the terraforming and seeding of life.
2. The problem with flat tards they don't check any evidence at all they use school boy experiments do back up their wrong theory's. And when you science the shit out of them the revert to memes or insults.
3. Also the depth of mud on the sea floor is quite shallow showing us that all this expansion happened relatively recently. There are massive seas of oceans under mountain ranges I.e the waters of the deep.
4. Wasn't it ben rich who said we found a error in the equation regarding gravity?.
5. The elite always put errors in the equations' for us goyim. We are not illuminated enough to know the real thuth .
6. Man this theory make total sense it also explains the so called mythical floods when the oceans of the deep burst though and kicked off the expanding earth. I'm always batting flat earth full retards and always point them in the direction of hollow and expanding earth but the idiots just wont listen they just buy and listen to falttard flat earth information and never do any research for them self's. They come out with their flat earth memes or say nasa did it or fish eye lenses that is all they have.
7. This would explain giants to. I believe that giants and some smaller humans were alive when dinosaur were on the earth I also believe some dinosaur lived to relatively recent times. In some parts of America people are reporting seeing small raptor type dinosaur. That evil little mans Richard Dawkins smashed up human and dinosaur tracks in Texas.
8. All went well until the increase gravity "theory" which simply doesn't work. If the mass of the Earth stays the same and the radius increases, basic math proves that gravitation WILL DECREASE. As an empirical demonstration: if radius tends to infinite the thickness of the crust of Earth tends to zero which means zero gravity.
9. If would be earth expanding this speed and mass growth, doesn't it impact on Earth's orbit even Moon's movement? There should be some another earth with different cycles, magnetic field and so on...
10. i should point out - that one method of earth expansion - could be due to the real possibility the our sun is part of a binary system - that cycles every 24,000 years - and during the closer part of the process - gravity from another star is pulling on the earth
11. Why don't you hit yourself over the head with an axe? You will hurt your brain of course!
    It's the the same result as to much booze, harsh drugs, choking your chicken to much etc. If you choose, "like these idiots", to live in fantasy land instead of reality it's going to damage you.
    I love a renegade thinker as much as anyone, but they have to be 1.sane 2.well educated 3. dignified in their presentation. They give full clear evidence ,at all times to support their assertions. Science is about evidence, it's about reality, it's about measurements, and most of all it's about constant testing, and peer review. This presentation is of little value without a shred of scientifically supported hypothesis to be had. Where's the data, where's the charts, graphs, statistics? Where's the beef?
12. Mass is coming from the interaction with the suns binary star
13. You're getting closer. Let me help you: The mass is coming from the energy of the sun.
14. According to Wikpedia:
    
    Le Sage's theory of gravitation is a kinetic theory of gravity originally proposed by Nicolas Fatio de Duillier in 1690 and later by Georges-Louis Le Sage in 1748. The theory proposed a mechanical explanation for Newton's gravitational force in terms of streams of tiny unseen particles (which Le Sage called ultra-mundane corpuscles) impacting all material objects from all directions.
    
    According to this model, any two material bodies partially shield each other from the impinging corpuscles, resulting in a net imbalance in the pressure exerted by the impact of corpuscles on the bodies, tending to drive the bodies together.
    
    Le Sage's own theory became a subject of re-newed interest in the latter part of the 19th century following a paper published by Kelvin in 1873. Kelvin stated that the absorbed energy represents a very high heat. Kelvin proposed that the excess heat might be absorbed by internal energy modes of the particles themselves, based on his proposal of the vortex-nature of matter.
    
    In other words, the original translational kinetic energy of the particles is transferred to internal energy modes. Kelvin also asserted that it would be possible to extract limitless amounts of free energy from the ultramundane flux, and described a perpetual motion machine to accomplish this.
    
    * * *
    
    Fact is, most bodies in space are hot! Stars show a luminosity mass relation that is consistent with LeSage's theory. What we might find hard to explain is the lack of heat of smaller bodies! Even here we must note that the Earth's centre is presumably as hot as the sun's surface, according to present theory. We presume this is due to radioactive decay, but it could quite easily be due to LeSage gravity!
    
    One interesting thing is that if the Earth's core is iron, and energy is constantly being absorbed by the Earth based on density, it might be that iron-56 might decay into water molecule and chlorine whilse iron-55 might decay into a water molecule and a sodium nucleus - with a spare carbon.
    
    * * *
15. We do not know how the earth is actually composed, It is all theory. This is not a new theory and it has merit. Both competing theories could be blended together, there is going to be plate movement regardless.
16. 38:21
    john ...lunpractor?
    
    who did he say?
17. Gas at the center of a planet would cause the planet to lose rotation, end of conspiracy
18. f Earth's radius is expanding .81 mm per year. it would have taken Earth 3.5 billion years to double in diameter. Earth would have been the size of Mars 3.5 billion years ago and sat right where Mars sits now. Mars is Earth but it is inside out, where the silicon is still trapped beneath the added matter, within its core. Mars is top heavy due to inheriting loads of iron after the formation of the planet, the iron has been migrating further inward but is still trapped within the upper mantle.
    The added mass after the planets formation would have slowed the planet down and the 'later' migration of iron toward its core will speed the planet back up. The reduction of matter from the mantle will cause the mantle to expand due to decompression from dropping the weight of iron, where iron was resisting volume.
    The added mass inherited by Mars is causing a great deal of compression on the primitive silicon based core of Mars, where Mars will eventually succumb to the top weight of iron and lose a vast amount of its core to orbit around Mars and some will fall back down to the surface of the planet. what gets left in orbit will become Mars new Moon similar to ours and what falls back to the surface will be the beginnings of continental land forms. This is what will drive future subduction for the red planet and a gradual expansion caused by both decompression coupled with added weight inherited by Mars core.
    We don't need a rogue planet to hit Mars it has already been hit by hundreds if not thousands of small meteor after its formation. This added weight is being heated by radioactive decay and is going to rightfully inherit its spot at the center of Mars, where. Mars will decompress just as Earth has done. It took Earth 3.5 billion years to get here. Mars will need the same amount of time to become as planet Earth. Mars is Earth but inside out which is why it is smaller, most of its iron is still trapped in the mantle where its core is still similar to Ganymede-Callisto, this would explain its weaker gravity since its iron is still displaced within its core as opposed to the planets core.
19. if this is true, we really need to be careful of massive, intergalactic space needles!! I'm sorry, but unlike my shite joke, the presentation was great.
    I saw you Rich Planet (love that show btw) and was meaning to check out your website, but stumbled on your YouTube channel first. I have to say there is some fascinating information to be gleaned here. Anyway keep up the good work Andrew, subbed.
20. this whole gas thing is making my stomach turn, maybe the Earth needs a Tums