Israel Boasts Agricultural Innovations

vue - Israel Boasts Agricultural Innovations

2m 13s: longueur

53810Nombre de vues

88Évaluation

Video courtesy of NTDTVWith an average of 20,000 visitors in past years, the "Agro Mashov" exhibition hoped to open for new Israeli companies doors to sprouting international markets, mainly in eastern Europe and the Far East.

Commentaires

God bless Israel. Mulching, do you study how best to use mulching for trees and shrubs? I've learned that mulching around fruit trees improved their productivity. Also flowers and bushes. Mulching helps protect the roots in extreme heat and cold. Mulching reduces water evaporation and allows the soil to breathe. God bless you and peace be with you.

Love Israel

I love and support Israel YHWH love and blessvand Jews

I am a graduate of agriculture in the philippines and is dreaming to work in israel.. in the same field... its truly unbelievable that israel is really blessed.. out of the dessert.. we can see much more high value crops, vegetable and flowers. truly amazing.. really the jews are like the jewels in the sight or GOD...

It's hard to believe that the Netherlands import flowers from Israel.

That's amazing, pioneers in agriculture!

Phyzzique & pierrelarouge, why don't you two morons grow up. When my sons were 10 years old, they sounded like you two. Nobody wants to hear you children fighting. If you can't act like grownups, go back to your sandboxes.

@phyzzique shhh assbandit, you have videos of gayboys working out on your channel, are they your bumchums? lol

@phyzzique Eat my shit gayboy.

we are interested hitech agri in india apro 2000hect

Now they growing killer plants in their quest to conquer the earth! be very afraid of zionist science, control the food control peoples ability to feed themselves, this is the zionist goal.

@trakkaton And I was wondering what your goal was in establishing a me as an untruthful character.

@Alschain Your inacccuracies and fallacies are escalating. You are a hopeless case and waste of time.

@trakkaton 1/2. Here we are delving into semantics. 3. Can be both. Bifurcation. 4. I offer fallacies I see in YOUR statements. My little bit of pseudo-philosophical 'wisdom'. 5. "begging the question",repetition etc. 6. Yes, rhetorical devices. You use capitalisation to emphasise and discredit. Yay, let's all deconstruct each other's comments. Otherwise, factually wrong. Many figures of expression are. Now you are free to ridicule my character. ps: have you actually read Notes on Nationalism?

@Txgomeric A) There is no proof that a dead carpenter from Nazareth with the name of Jeshua even lived. All we know is a synchretic patchworked fairy tale, consisting of various popular cults of that time. B) You fail to mention how the Muslims saved the scientific knowledge that was established by the greeks when the christian fundamentalists were on a war against scientific knowledge. That is the reason why this knowledge was preserved at all. C) The church burned dissidents alive. Explain.

@Alschain 3. You have not used the fallacy of the undistributed middle, but rather an association fallacy. And once again: What do you have to offer except fallacies? Will you at last come up with at least one single fact? Are you finally ready to admit that your hyperbolic statement "...have done NOTHING but insult and belittle each other.." is FACTUALLY wrong?

@Alschain 1./ 2. It's not my fault if you lack the knowledge of the definitions of words. "Description" is the act of explaining the property of something. "Insult" is the use of an untrue description of a person in order to induce feelings of inferiority while the properties have to be undesirable from the standpoint of the person that is the target of the insult. Insults are used as an substitute for sound reasoning or proper description. It is NOT the same as severe criticism or mocking.

@trakkaton 1, 2. You tell me to not make false and unfounded claims and yet you do not support your own statement as to how your describing and insulting are mutually exclusive. There, I have presented a fact. 3. I've merely stated that I think both religious and political reasons contribute to the conflict here (as well as other factors). In your example, I only equal child porn producers if the fallacy of the undistributed middle is taken into account. Correct statement, wrong conclusion. :)

@Alschain 1. Describing and insulting ARE mutually exclusive. 2. I don't care whether you support a side or not. But just presenting some false and unfounded claims (like the hyperbole "...have done NOTHING but insult and belittle each other..") won't cut it. At some point you will have to present at least SOME facts. 3. You've equalled "religious" and "political" reasons just like I would if I'd say "you and child porn producers should both be subjects to international law". Not that difficult.

@trakkaton 1. Describing and insulting are not mutually exclusive. Describing people as imbeciles and idiots are insults. 2. I'm not here to support a side. Please don't expect me to. 3. I haven't at any point equalled 'religious' and 'political'. However these are not always independent either. Also, I specifically refer to 'Notes on Nationalism', in which I assume would apply to you based on your past comments. I may be wrong, but you have also assumed I "don't understand the concepts".